Regulatory Update

BREAKING NEWS: Judge Strikes Down Nursing Home Staffing Rule in Major Victory

Polaris Group Profile
Polaris Group
April 8, 2025
Polaris Group Profile
Polaris Group
April 8, 2025
Summary

Judge strikes down nursing home staffing mandate, allowing flexible solutions and innovation in care quality.

Download PDF
Download icon

In a significant development, a federal judge has struck down the national nursing home staffing mandate, which required 24/7 registered nurse coverage. This ruling is seen as a major victory for nursing home associations and providers who have long argued that rigid staffing mandates are not the solution to improving care quality. Instead, they emphasize the need for flexible staffing solutions tailored to the specific needs of each facility. This decision is particularly welcomed by rural nursing homes, which faced substantial challenges with the mandate and can now focus on more feasible staffing models.

Judge's Ruling:

A federal judge ruled against a national nursing home staffing mandate that required nursing homes to boost their nursing staff in coming years.

The mandate required 24/7 registered nurse coverage, which the judge found exceeded the authority of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Reactions:

Nursing home associations, including the American Health Care Association and LeadingAge, welcomed the ruling, stating imposing mandates rather than addressing funding adequacy and workforce sufficiency is wrong-headed.

Providers expressed relief, emphasizing the need for flexible staffing solutions rather than rigid mandates.

Implications:
  • Flexibility in Staffing: Nursing homes can now implement more flexible staffing solutions tailored to their specific needs rather than adhering to rigid 24/7 registered nurse coverage requirements.
  • Focus on Innovation: The ruling encourages nursing homes to develop innovative and locally informed strategies to improve care quality.
  • Relief for Rural Providers: Rural nursing homes, which faced substantial challenges with the mandate, are particularly relieved and can now focus on more feasible staffing models.
  • Potential Congressional Action: There is a call for Congress to block the staffing mandate entirely, which could further impact future regulations and staffing requirements.
  • Ongoing Debate: The decision may influence similar cases and ongoing discussions about the best approaches to ensure quality care in nursing homes.

Future Actions:

There is a call for Congress to act and block the staffing mandate entirely. The decision may influence similar cases and ongoing discussions about nursing home staffing requirements.

Opposition:

Proponents of the staffing rule, including unions and consumer groups, argue that the mandate would have improved care quality and reduced hospitalizations.

If you have any specific questions, please feel free to contact your Polaris Consultant.

In a significant development, a federal judge has struck down the national nursing home staffing mandate, which required 24/7 registered nurse coverage. This ruling is seen as a major victory for nursing home associations and providers who have long argued that rigid staffing mandates are not the solution to improving care quality. Instead, they emphasize the need for flexible staffing solutions tailored to the specific needs of each facility. This decision is particularly welcomed by rural nursing homes, which faced substantial challenges with the mandate and can now focus on more feasible staffing models.

Judge's Ruling:

A federal judge ruled against a national nursing home staffing mandate that required nursing homes to boost their nursing staff in coming years.

The mandate required 24/7 registered nurse coverage, which the judge found exceeded the authority of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Reactions:

Nursing home associations, including the American Health Care Association and LeadingAge, welcomed the ruling, stating imposing mandates rather than addressing funding adequacy and workforce sufficiency is wrong-headed.

Providers expressed relief, emphasizing the need for flexible staffing solutions rather than rigid mandates.

Implications:
  • Flexibility in Staffing: Nursing homes can now implement more flexible staffing solutions tailored to their specific needs rather than adhering to rigid 24/7 registered nurse coverage requirements.
  • Focus on Innovation: The ruling encourages nursing homes to develop innovative and locally informed strategies to improve care quality.
  • Relief for Rural Providers: Rural nursing homes, which faced substantial challenges with the mandate, are particularly relieved and can now focus on more feasible staffing models.
  • Potential Congressional Action: There is a call for Congress to block the staffing mandate entirely, which could further impact future regulations and staffing requirements.
  • Ongoing Debate: The decision may influence similar cases and ongoing discussions about the best approaches to ensure quality care in nursing homes.

Future Actions:

There is a call for Congress to act and block the staffing mandate entirely. The decision may influence similar cases and ongoing discussions about nursing home staffing requirements.

Opposition:

Proponents of the staffing rule, including unions and consumer groups, argue that the mandate would have improved care quality and reduced hospitalizations.

If you have any specific questions, please feel free to contact your Polaris Consultant.

continue reading

Sign-up for the Polaris Pulse Newsletter

We filter out the noise and provide you the information you need to keep you informed.

I want to subscribe to...
Great– your all set!
You will start receiving our Polaris Pulse Newsletter in your inbox.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.